Bugs/Issues
Electoral Votes Map is not up to date. For example game says Texas has 38 votes, in reality they have 40.
Placeholder text found
I'm not sure that's how this issue really is in real-life. E.g. republicans being for Defunding Law Enforcement, and Dems being against it? Seems like it accidentally shares the same data values as stronger law enforcement. Reference: Ad in Tennessee.
Builder Cards potentially not doing anything Seems to be an issue with ones involving 20, 25, 50%, 100% etc. numbers whose values are a bit over the place. From testing I don't see the effects as advertised. Hopefully further investigation can be done.
when it says 50% it seems to round, so all it seems to do is take away 1 stamina cost when building, instead of 2, so it leans more to 25% than 50% decrease on construction costs
This reads as though Dems oppose sanctions in Russia, to my understanding the majority SUPPORT Sanctions on Russia
HQ Clipped into the map in players game. Save attached.
says Republicans support social media censorship when all the repub candidates are against it
Gameplay
Andrew Yang: he had a real trademark style that 2020 nailed well some people are going to be commenting on this
Kamala skintone looks a bit light.
QOL
Allow players to view caucus results after the voting closes. For example - I managed to barely flip Iowa in the early game, but seeing by how much would have been nice. Similarly, I lost Nevada, but polling was close - I have no way of seeing by how much I lost during playtime or after the fact.
Popular player request: Allow players to view caucus results after the voting closes. For example - I managed to barely flip Iowa in the early game, but seeing by how much would have been nice. Similarly, I lost Nevada, but polling was close - I have no way of seeing by how much I lost during playtime or after the fact.
Text/Typos
Players are finding the issue of “Illegal Immigration” to come across bias and not read well in regards to opposing/supporting. Suggest changing to Tightening Border Security
This seems... a bit out of line with republican stances, it should be about opposing gun control measures for a republican, for reference player is playing crenshaw
This card also reads opposite of what is intended. It likely elevates your stance AGAINST being tough on crime.
fix the grammar here, comma instead of semicolon, fix some capitalization in the [] statement, also it’s heads up not head’s up
Capital is misspelled